Plagiarism and Anti-Plagiarism

  1. Discussion
  2. Web Sites
  3. Press articles
  4. Web search engines
  5. MLA Handbook & Web Citation Style


Discussion

College plagiarism seems to be on the increase. So we round up and decry the usual suspects: the rise of the internet and the decline of student writing. To be sure, there are term papers for sale on the internet, and the very process of surfing the Web encourages looseness in borrowing. And surely fewer students seem to master the art of sustained research and argument in long papers these days. Each semester at term paper time a few of my colleagues invariably seek computer help for diagnosing and tracing suspected instances of plagiarism. Of course, by then it is almost too late. For many teachers, the labor of proving suspected plagiarism is a formidable obstacle to face at the end of the semester. If plagiarism is to be combated, it must be done regularly throughout the semester, not just at the end.

Here are some suggestions.

A: The Problem of Plagiarism:

Try these questions out on yourself.

B: The instructor's dilemma:

If a faculty member is not sure of the answers to the questions above, what can students be expected to know? If students have substantially more computer expertise than faculty members in using the internet, computer multitasking, and CD-ROMs, are they therefore almost able to plagiarize with impunity and without fear of detection from their teachers?

What do you estimate to be the rate of occurrence of the following in your courses? Are they rare, infrequent, occasional, familiar, common, customary, typical, normal, prevalent, or universal?

If you were to do an analysis of plagiarism as a strategy for student conduct (weighing both benefits and risks) in your courses, would you agree that the short-term benefits appear to outweigh all the costs, risks, and disadvantages? In a popular culture in which authority is routinely disparaged and extra-legal methods glamorized, is plagiarism becoming emotionally satisfying to some students?

C: The solution: Possible countermeasures.

1. Don't merely assign an isolated term paper at the start of the semester and then collect it at the end. Increasingly students do not know how to do the planning, research, and revision required in such papers. Under such circumstances plagiarism may be a strategy of desperation more than of opportunism.

2. Provide a continuing context for student work, including shorter papers, research proposals, and oral reports. Insist that students use a series of several formal worksheets for research proposals. Spend some time explaining research opportunities in the field, including a supervised visit to the college library. Explain the opportunities and limitations of research on the internet. Be frank and open about the existence of purchased papers.

3. In small classes, make the research process (including the existence of plagiarism) as public as possible. Ask students to share research proposals with the entire class in oral reports. These occasions can be a major learning opportunity as workable and unworkable proposals are discussed, as well as interesting and trite ones. Ask students which proposals they feel are most original and which seem indistinguishable from plagiarized ones.

Do not accept papers that short-circuit the research proposal procedure. They are much more likely to be plagiarized. Proposals that mysteriously arise from no where and reach an unexpected conclusion are to be suspected.

4. In larger classes, insist on a research trail which becomes part of the submitted paper. Insist on a research plan which makes use of the college library. You may wish to insist on all the original handwritten notes, marked photocopies or printouts, and copies of all computer disk files. Make your suggestions regarding the research plan and the student's use of them a formal part of the project.

5. If you receive a paper you suspect to be plagiarized, move cautiously. Examine the sources cited carefully: do they cluster oddly, or seem unlikely to have been found in the college library? Are errors in bibliographical technique actually efforts to misrepresent the research done. Does the style of the opening and closing paragraphs differ from the others? Be careful what you write on the paper: writing only "Please see me" makes its point emphatically. Ask the student in a conference to explain the main point or points or terminology of the paper. Discuss with the student possible avenues of additional research from any unused material.

Don't assume infallibility: yes, plagiarized papers can always slip through, and the suspicion of plagiarism can always be raised where it doesn't apply.


Web Sites

Useful webpages for detecting and fighting plagiarism:


Press articles

Recent articles in the press (1998)

Ian Zack, "The Latest Academic Vice: Computer-Assisted Cheating" New York Times, September 16, 1998

John N. Hickman, "Cybercheats: Term Paper Shopping Online" The New Republic, March 23, 1998


Web search engines

...In reponse to a May 1998 query about using the internet to detect plagiarism in a dissertation...

Direct and indirect internet plagiarism are rampant. Most recent articles and books in copyright are NOT on the internet in full but papers quoting from them are. So are many class and personal discussions. Unattributed passages are included increasingly in papers that are "assembled" rather than written. It may be easier for you to ask the writer to review his or her research methods than to undertake a full scale hunt. If that's not possible you may find other suspicious evidence, such as citations that all fall into a narrow time period or are suspiciously too old or too recent. Or sources that fail to account for the discussion (unattributed passages) or citations not reflected in the discussion (exaggerated bibliography). Needless to say, differences in style. emphasis, or direction and unaccounted digressions or slightly remote backgrounding can be pretty suspicious.

But it can be exhausting to try to trace electronic plagiarism, and it can be hazardous to make the accusation without proof. Can you simply complain of the sparseness or inappropriateness of the documentation? Are there other members of the dissertation committee who can be helpful?

If you you do go ahead to use the internet to fight the internet, here are some ideas:

Detection method 1: find some distinctive phrases or misspellings (2-3 words) and search for them as "strings" on a search engine such as www.altavista.com.

Detection method 2: look at what's generally available in a directory subject search such as www.yahoo.com. Try a few different keywords. After your first Yahoo search a list of alternate search engines will appear at the bottom of your screen. (You can also use method #1 or #2 with a multiple search engine, such as www.metacrawler.com or www.profusion.com. Match these hits with the sources in the article. You can also trace subject discussions in newsgroups and listservs on www.deja.com.

Detection method 3: look at commonly available electronic encyclopedias online or distributed on CD-ROM, such as Encarta, given away to millions of Office 95 users as Microsoft Bookshelf.

Detection method 4: Look at commercial term paper services, such as www.schoolsucks.com. (I'm not making this up.)

Detection method 5: replicate the research for the paper by tracing the subject, author(s), title(s) online. Two good places to start are Voice of the Shuttle and Internet Public Library Literary Criticism . These will lead you to more specialized Web sites.

Detection method 6: If this is a dissertation, look at advanced tools such as DAI Abstracts, specialist discussion groups, listservs, newsgroups, etc. (I see student requests for help all the time in professional forums.)

Detection method 7: Go beyond the gratis internet to see what abstracts and articles are available commercially from Dialog, Uncover, Northernlight (see Special Collections) and Electric Library

Detection method 8: Use the "homework helper" facility of AOL, Scholastic, and comparable sites.

It is legitimate of course for students to use these methods but I almost never see a properly formatted citation for an electronic source. (See the MLA Web Style Sheet, below.) I have also received papers which are simply downloaded abstracts strung together. Although there is a charge for such articles, it can be as low as a dollar or two per article, and often the abstracts are free.

Good luck!


MLA Handbook and Web Citation Style

MLA Handbook and Web Citation Style


Heyward Ehrlich
May 20, 1998; minor additions/corrections Sept 26, 1998; May 17, 1999; Jan. 8, Mar. 20, 2000
Send comments to ehrlich@andromeda.rutgers.edu.