GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (GASB)

State of IOWA

Performance measurement is statewide and is manifested in Budgeting-for-Results, which is a part of Managing-for-Results.  Budgeting-for-results has been primarily a management-driven initiative.  Some agencies use federal measures to report state data. 

The Strategic Planning Council is charged with finding out what citizens want the state to look like in 2010.  It has 21 members comprised of citizens and government employees, and focuses on education, business and labor, agriculture, law enforcement, and local government.

Items of note include:

  • Enterprise planning is one function of the Planning Council, which includes the systematic reporting of results to citizens.  The governor expresses a desire to make public participation widespread across many areas of government via enterprise planning.

  • Agencies report to the governor through boards comprised of persons representing “citizen interests.” 

  • The Department of Corrections is community-based with eight regions governed by boards of judges and citizens;  it is thought of as having “significant” citizen involvement. 

  • Public officials stress the importance of local control in education. 

  • The Council on Human Investment is comprised of “public and private citizens” and works with the Department of Management to promote performance measurement. The Council uses citizen surveys as a way to tap citizen viewpoints.  There is some disagreement over whether the survey is the appropriate mechanism.

  • There is a lack of specificity in terms of how citizens are involved.  The case study only rates the degree of involvement (e.g., hi or low).

  • In the interest of participation, transportation officials went to the public with about 8 options and asked which they preferred.  Once the preferred option was selected, administrators asked what they, as administrators, needed to do to accomplish the selected option.  They then developed a plan outlining the details and went back to the public.  The public had input again and the plan was taken to the commission for their input.  The plan went back to the public one last time and the commission subsequently adopted the plan. 

  • Four times a year the Department of Transportation and the Transportation Commission hold one-day public input meetings in the 4 quadrants of the state.  They receive input via in-person comments, letters, and the internet. 

  • Iowa received a Hammer Award for its use of the internet.  They are very proud of the success they’ve had with involving citizens in the transportation planning process, and communicating results about education via the Annual Condition of Education Report.

  • The future of performance measurement in Iowa entails greater accountability via increased communication with the public.   


 

 Local Governments:

Austin, TX; Multnomah County, OR; Portland, OR; Prince William County, VA; Tucson, AZ; Phoenix, AZWinston-Salem, NC; Catawba County, NC; Dayton, OH; Coral Springs, FL; Long Beach, CA; Ramsey County, MN 

 State Governments:  

Arizona, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Oregon, Texas

 Background Information:

 

 

 







 

| NCPP Home Page | Policy Statement | CDGP Home Page |
 |
Curricular Resources | Graduate Department for Public Administration |
Updated July 23, 2003