GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (GASB)

PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VA

Prince William County emphasizes accountability, according to the author.  Their first citizen survey was conducted in 1993 and their first SEA report was produced in 1995.  They situate their measurement effort in the context of managing-for-results.  To formulate the county’s strategic plan, citizens, elected officials, and staff are all involved.  After consensus, the plan goes to the County Planning Commission for “coordination with the planning process” and then to the Board of Supervisors for approval.  They claim there is a lot of buy-in into the process. 

Items of note include:

  • Citizen surveys show that over 90% of residents have been satisfied with services every year since 1993.  There are reasonable levels of satisfaction with the manner in which government disseminates information.

  • Police and Social services programs are particularly interested in what the citizen survey says about how they are providing services. 

  • There is a quarterly citizen’s newsletter, “Prince William Reports.”

  • The 2000 strategic plan identifies several strategies for enhancing communication with the public. Strategies include: improved dissemination of information; network and share reports and studies from other jurisdictions; review audit findings and provide implementation recommendations; add schools, parks, service authority, solid waste disposal, transportation, administration boards and commissions, and other expenditure areas to the SEA report; incorporate activity-costing into the annual fiscal plan; establish an efficiency program; develop methods to survey citizens about specific programs and activities. 

  • Citizens are involved in social services programs and the outcome selection process. 

  • The county libraries have boards completely comprised of citizens. 

  • The citizen survey is an important part of the SEA report and the annual budget process. 

  • Interviewees cited the existence of extensive satisfaction data for different areas of government. 

  • Twenty three percent of respondents to the annual citizen survey indicated that they had visited the county’s web site. 

  • Some high-ranking officials feel that performance information is not published unless the information is negative. 

  • The consensus among officials is that measurement efforts have been successful in terms of establishing accountability and communication with the public. 


 

 Local Governments:

Austin, TX; Multnomah County, OR; Portland, OR; Prince William County, VA; Tucson, AZ; Phoenix, AZWinston-Salem, NC; Catawba County, NC; Dayton, OH; Coral Springs, FL; Long Beach, CA; Ramsey County, MN 

 State Governments:  

Arizona, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Oregon, Texas

 Background Information:

 

 

 







 

| NCPP Home Page | Policy Statement | CDGP Home Page |
 |
Curricular Resources | Graduate Department for Public Administration |
Updated July 23, 2003